Friday, 6 November 2009
A Question
If it is not safe for more than half of its 1,100 international staff in Afghanistan, people that have round-the-clock armed guards, why is the country still considered safe enough to continue returning asylum seekers against their will, people who have fled political/religious/sexual persecution and who remain in fear of their lives?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment